On Friday, March 28, the Gujarat High Court
granted three months of temporary bail to Asaram Bapu, who was convicted in a
2013 rape case by a sessions court in 2023. Asaram, currently serving a life
sentence, had sought bail on medical grounds, which the court found sufficient
to justify temporary release.
Asaram
Bapu had filed a plea before the Gujarat High Court seeking six months of
temporary bail, citing the need for medical treatment. His counsel argued that
doctors had recommended Panchkarma therapy, a 90-day course, for his health
condition. It is noteworthy that in January this year, the Supreme Court had
granted him interim bail until March 31 on medical grounds.
Earlier
today, a division bench of the Gujarat High Court, comprising Justice Ilesh J
Vora and Justice Sandeep N Bhatt, delivered a split verdict on Asaram Bapu's
bail plea. Justice Vora ruled in favor of granting him temporary bail for three
months, considering the medical recommendations. In contrast, Justice Bhatt
rejected the plea, holding that the circumstances did not warrant further
temporary release.
Justice
Supehia in his order said, "State has also not said that applicant has
misused liberty in these three months, and that he has been sitting idle and
enjoying the three months which has been granted by the Supreme Court. Under
the circumstances application is allowed by confirming view expressed by
Justice Ilesh Vora. Point of difference of opinion is accordingly
answered."
While delivering his order, Justice Supehia
took note of the statements made by various doctors who had examined Asaram
Bapu. The judge observed that the medical opinions highlighted Asaram's history
of ailments and indicated that he had not yet fully recovered from his health
issues. Justice Supehia emphasized that none of the doctors' reports
conclusively stated that Asaram was free from all his medical conditions,
thereby acknowledging the ongoing nature of his health concerns.
The
judge referred to the order passed by Justice Vora, which stated that the State
had not raised any doubts regarding Asaram Bapu's medical condition or the
necessity of his ongoing treatment. The court acknowledged that the State had
not contested the legitimacy of the medical grounds cited by Asaram for seeking
temporary bail.
Furthermore,
the judge noted that the Supreme Court had previously granted Asaram three
months of interim bail after thoroughly examining his prevailing medical
condition. The judge observed that the State had not claimed that Asaram had
fully recovered from the ailments for which he was initially granted bail by
the Supreme Court. The court also highlighted that there was no assertion from
the State suggesting that Asaram no longer required further medical or
Ayurvedic treatment, thereby indicating the continued
need for his temporary release on health grounds.