The Karnataka High Court, on Monday,
granted interim relief by staying the order issued by the Bangalore District
Consumer Commission, which had held PVR Cinemas liable to compensate a
complainant for delaying the screening of a movie by showing extended
advertisements instead of starting the film at the scheduled time.
The interim stay was ordered by a single
judge, Justice M. Nagaprasanna, while presiding over a petition filed by the
Multiplex Association of India. The stay will remain in effect until March 27,
providing temporary relief to PVR Cinemas from the compensation directive.
It said, “The Consumer forum accepts the
plea of petitioner and traverses the complaint and answers the complaint as if
it has jurisdiction akin to a public interest petition. It indulges in a
discourse about how a movie show should be run and directs that the theatres
should not project advertisements, as it would become unfair trade practice.
All these directions of the consumer forum are on the face of it without
jurisdiction."
Dismissing the contention of the government
that an appelate remedy is available to the petitioners before the State
Consumer Forum, the court said, “While that may be that, an appeal remedy will
not halt or put shackles on the hand of this court in exercising jurisdiction
under Article 226 of Constitution. More so, when it comes across a case where
the concerned fora or court has acted in blatant violation of jurisdiction”
Following which it said “Therefore there
shall be an interim order to stay as prayed for till the next date of hearing.”
Court then issued notice to the Respondent-State and the Complainant Abhishek M
R. During the hearing Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi appearing for the
petitioner argued that the case raises a nationwide issue. "Mischief
mongers have already started creating problems against us. The council has no
jurisdiction to do this,” he said.
The
complainant had purchased three tickets for the movie Sam Bahadur at PVR Cinemas in Bangalore, paying a total of Rs.825.66 for
himself and his family. The movie was scheduled to begin at 4:05 PM, with a
runtime of approximately 2 hours and 25 minutes. However, due to prolonged
advertisements, the complainant and his family were required to remain seated
for an additional 25 minutes beyond the expected end time.
Before
the consumer forum, the complainant argued that this delay caused him
inconvenience and resulted in losses that could not be quantified in monetary
terms. He further contended that screening the movie beyond its scheduled start
time constituted a deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite Parties,
thereby justifying his claim for compensation.
Upon reviewing the complaint and the
accompanying statements, the forum observed that the “Opposite Parties had
violated the government order as per which the theatres could play 10 mins of
public service announcements and welfare schemes of Central Government and
State Government." The forum further emphasized that theatre owners are
obligated to adhere strictly to the timings mentioned on the tickets. In this
particular case, the movie was scheduled to begin at 4:05 PM, as indicated on
the complainant's tickets. The forum clarified that any advertisements should
have been aired by the theatre authorities before 4:05 PM and not afterward.
The Commission concluded that the
complainant had raised the issue with valid reasoning, noting that several
other individuals were likely to have experienced the same inconvenience on the
day the movie was scheduled to be screened.
As a result, the Commission directed the
theatre authorities to specify the actual movie start time on cinema tickets
issued to the public. Additionally, PVR Cinemas and PVR Inox Ltd. were ordered
to pay Rs.20,000
to the complainant as compensation for mental anguish and inconvenience, along
with Rs.8,000 to cover litigation expenses. Moreover, PVR Cinemas was instructed to deposit Rs.1,00,000 as punitive damages
into the Consumer Welfare Fund.