A lawyer on Tuesday brought to the
attention of the Chief Justice of India an alleged incident of violence that
took place inside a courtroom at the Tis Hazari Courts complex in Delhi.
According to the lawyer, the incident occurred last Saturday while he was
appearing before the court of Additional District Judge Harjeet Singh Pal in a
matter where he was representing one of the accused persons.
The lawyer stated that during the court
proceedings, the complainant’s advocate allegedly entered the courtroom along
with several unidentified individuals. He claimed that these persons forcibly
entered the courtroom and assaulted both him and the accused in the presence of
the presiding judge. As per his account, the attackers locked the courtroom
door from the inside and proceeded to unleash violence, creating a serious
breach of courtroom security and decorum.
Raising the issue through an oral mention
before the Chief Justice of India, the lawyer said that the incident had left
him shaken and raised grave concerns about the safety of advocates and
litigants inside court premises. He further alleged that the local police were
reluctant or fearful of taking action in the matter, prompting him to seek
intervention at the highest judicial level. He clarified that he was making the
mention in his capacity as a member of the Supreme Court Bar Association.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, however,
questioned the appropriateness of raising the matter orally before the Supreme
Court instead of approaching the institutional authorities of the Delhi
judiciary. The Chief Justice pointed out that the proper course would have been
to formally bring the incident to the notice of the Chief Justice of the Delhi
High Court, who exercises administrative control over the subordinate judiciary
in the capital. He expressed concern over the choice of forum and indicated that
such issues should first be addressed at the appropriate administrative level
rather than through oral mentions before the Supreme Court.
The Chief Justice advised the lawyer to
submit a detailed written complaint to the Chief Justice of the Delhi High
Court, outlining the incident and the allegations of assault inside the
courtroom. He also directed that a copy of the complaint be forwarded to his
office. Emphasizing the distinction between judicial and administrative
functions, the Chief Justice made it clear that the matter would be dealt with
on the administrative side and that no judicial proceedings were warranted at
that stage.
Assuring the lawyer that the issue would
not be ignored, the Chief Justice remarked that misconduct of this nature
within court premises was wholly unacceptable. He indicated that once a formal
complaint was received, the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court would be
expected to take cognizance of the allegations and initiate appropriate action.
The Chief Justice underscored that violence, intimidation, or lawlessness
inside courts strikes at the very foundation of the justice delivery system and
cannot be tolerated under any circumstances.
The incident, if substantiated, raises
serious questions about courtroom security and the protection of legal
professionals while discharging their duties. Courts are meant to be spaces
governed by law, order, and respect for institutional authority, and any
breakdown of these principles poses a direct threat to the rule of law. The
Chief Justice’s response reflected the judiciary’s firm stance against any form
of “gunda raj” or mob dominance within court premises, while also reinforcing
the importance of following established institutional channels for redressal.
The matter is now expected to be taken up
administratively by the Delhi High Court following the submission of a formal
complaint, with the Supreme Court monitoring the issue through appropriate
administrative mechanisms.