• Home
  • About
  • Expertise
  • Insight  
  • Blog
  • Career
  • Contact
  • News

    On Friday, the Supreme Court issued notices to the Union Government and the State of Uttar Pradesh in response to a petition seeking directions to permit Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti Language University, Lucknow, to conduct examinations, declare results, and grant degrees for Kamil (graduate) and Fazil (post-graduate) students enrolled in recognized Madarsas. The bench comprising Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, Justice AG Masih, and Justice AS Chandukar issued notice in a petition filed by the Teachers Association Madaris Arabia and Haji Diwan Saheb Zama. The petition specifically seeks directions to the State of Uttar Pradesh to authorize Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti Language University, Lucknow, to conduct examinations and confer degrees for students pursuing graduation (Kamil) and post-graduation (Fazil) in recognized Madarsa courses within the State.

    The petitioners further seek a direction to the University to "conduct the final examinations, declare the result and grant degrees of 'Fazil' and 'Kamil' courses strictly in terms of Section 22 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956." The bench, after hearing the submissions, issued notice and directed that the matter be tagged with another pending petition titled Mohd Laman Raza and Ors v. Union of India & Ors, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 128/2025. In that matter, a Supreme Court bench consisting of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan had, in February, issued notice in a plea seeking the transfer or accommodation of students enrolled in Fazil and Kamil courses to other recognized educational institutions.

    The present petition places reliance on the decision in Anjum Kadari v. Union of India & Ors, wherein the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 and set aside the judgment of the Allahabad High Court, which had earlier invalidated the Act. However, in the same decision, the Supreme Court held that the provisions of the Madarsa Education Act relating to 'Fazil' and 'Kamil' courses were unconstitutional, as they conflicted with the University Grants Commission Act, enacted under Entry 66 of List I of the Constitution.

    Following this ruling, the petition highlights that the Madarsa Education Board, through correspondence dated 16.01.2025 addressed to all District Minority Welfare Officers across the State of Uttar Pradesh, stated that no Madarsas in the State were authorized to impart education in 'Fazil' and 'Kamil' courses, and that the Madarsa Education Board itself was not empowered to grant degrees for these courses.

    The petition underscores that the State’s directive could severely impact the academic and professional futures of nearly 50,000 students currently enrolled in 'Fazil' (post-graduate) and 'Kamil' (graduate) courses, as well as students pursuing the 'Alim' (Senior Secondary) course in recognized Madarsas across Uttar Pradesh. It argues that the correspondence issued by the Madarsa Board would leave these students without any academic recourse, violating their fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 28, and 30 of the Constitution. The plea draws support from the Anjum Kadari judgment, where the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the U.P. Madarsa Education Act, 2004 for regulating Madarsa education at the school level but held that the Act’s provisions concerning higher education degrees like 'Fazil' and 'Kamil' conflicted with the UGC Act and were therefore unconstitutional.

    Accordingly, the petition seeks two primary reliefs: first, a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to authorize Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti Language University, Lucknow, to conduct examinations and confer degrees for 'Kamil' and 'Fazil' courses offered by recognized Madarsas in the state; and second, a direction to the University itself to carry out final examinations, declare results, and grant degrees strictly in accordance with Section 22 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956. The petition is filed with the assistance of Advocate-on-Record (AOR) Rohit Amit Sthalekar.

    Our Services

    If You Need Any Help
    Contact With Us

    info@adhwaitha.com

    View Our More News