The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA)
has raised serious concerns over the markedly low representation of women in
the higher judiciary, encompassing both the Supreme Court and the High Courts,
and has urged the Collegium to prioritize gender diversity in upcoming judicial
appointments. In a resolution passed on August 30, 2025, the SCBA highlighted
that several High Courts, including those in Uttarakhand, Tripura, Meghalaya,
and Manipur, currently have no women judges. Nationwide, out of nearly 1,100 sanctioned
posts for High Court judges, approximately 670 are occupied by men, whereas
only 103 are held by women. The Association expressed strong disappointment
over the recent round of judicial appointments, noting that no women were
considered, and emphasized that since 2021, no woman judge has been appointed
to the Supreme Court. At present, Justice B.V. Nagarathna remains the sole
woman judge on the apex court bench.
The SCBA recalled that its President,
Senior Advocate Vikas Singh, had previously written to the Chief Justice of
India on May 24, 2025, and again on July 18, 2025, urging that women receive at
least proportional representation in higher judicial appointments. The
resolution stressed that achieving greater gender balance on the Bench is
essential not only for ensuring fair and equal representation but also for
bolstering public confidence in the judiciary. A more gender-inclusive Bench,
the SCBA observed, would enrich judicial perspectives, ensure that a wider
array of experiences is represented in judicial decision-making, and reflect
the diverse fabric of society in the administration of justice.
In line with these concerns, the SCBA
resolved to request that the Chief Justice of India and the Collegium give
urgent and serious consideration to the appointment and elevation of more women
judges in the forthcoming rounds of judicial selections for both the Supreme
Court and the High Courts. The Association underscored that a proactive
approach in this regard is necessary to address the long-standing gender
imbalance and to ensure that qualified women candidates are not overlooked. The
SCBA’s call for action gains added significance in the context of recent
controversy surrounding the appointment of Justice Vipul Pancholi to the
Supreme Court, where questions were raised regarding why he was preferred over
at least three senior women judges who were eligible for elevation.
The Association emphasized that judicial
appointments must reflect a commitment to diversity, equity, and merit,
ensuring that the Bench mirrors the demographic composition and societal values
of the country. The SCBA concluded that meaningful gender representation is
critical for strengthening the credibility and legitimacy of judicial
institutions, and that continued underrepresentation of women undermines public
trust and limits the range of perspectives available in judicial deliberations.
Accordingly, it urged the Collegium to take corrective measures in the upcoming
appointments to ensure that women judges are appropriately represented across
all levels of the higher judiciary, thereby promoting a more inclusive and
representative judicial system.