On August 6, the Supreme Court directed all
States and Union Territories to conduct a comprehensive survey to determine
whether orphan children are receiving the benefits of free and compulsory
education as mandated under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory
Education Act, 2009 (RTE Act). The direction came during the hearing of a
public interest litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Poulomi Pavini Shukla, who
appeared in person, seeking care, protection, and educational access for orphan
children in India.
The case was heard by a bench comprising
Justices BV Nagarathna and KV Viswanathan. The petitioner highlighted the
absence of any official data on orphan children, pointing out that even the
national census does not capture such information. She cited UNICEF data
estimating that India has over 25 million orphaned children, among the highest
globally. She also urged the inclusion of orphaned children in the national
census to ensure their needs are adequately represented in policymaking.
The petitioner submitted that although the
RTE Act mandates free and compulsory education for all children aged 6 to 14
under Section 3, orphans often remain excluded due to the lack of specific
categorization under the Act. Section 12(c) of the RTE Act requires private
unaided and special category schools to reserve 25% of seats for children
belonging to disadvantaged groups and weaker sections. While some States such
as Delhi, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Odisha, Sikkim, Manipur, Meghalaya, and Arunachal
Pradesh have issued notifications including orphans within this quota, many
others have not.
Shukla argued that orphaned children, due
to the absence of parental or guardian support, clearly qualify as
disadvantaged and should be expressly included under the Act. She referred to
Section 12(d), which uses the phrase "such other factor," to argue
that orphans can and should be interpreted within this broader category of
disadvantaged children. In response, the Court noted that the RTE Act is
intended to benefit all children and emphasized the responsibility of the State
to act as parens patriae, a guardian for orphaned children—to ensure their
right to education is protected.
Taking these submissions into account, the
Court directed the States and Union Territories to carry out a two-fold survey:
first, to identify how many orphan children have already been granted admission
under the RTE Act; and second, to ascertain how many have been denied access
and the reasons for such denial. The Court instructed that, where orphaned
children have not been admitted due solely to their status, authorities must
ensure that they are enrolled in nearby schools. Four weeks were granted for
the States and UTs to comply and submit affidavits detailing their actions and
findings
Additionally, the Court encouraged States
that have not yet issued notifications to include orphans within the 25%
reservation quota under Section 12(c) to do so. If a State chooses not to issue
such a notification, it must submit an affidavit explaining its reasoning,
signed by the Secretary of the Department of Education.
Following the main order, the petitioner
urged the Court to direct the inclusion of orphaned children in the national
census. Since Solicitor General Tushar Mehta was present in court for another
matter, the bench sought his view. Mehta responded positively and assured the
Court that he would seek instructions on the issue.
The matter has been listed for further
hearing on September 9, with the Court expecting compliance reports and updates
from the States and Union Territories by then.