The Supreme Court on Monday granted the
Union Government permission to extend the tenure of Chairpersons and Members of
various Tribunals, who are scheduled to retire in the near future, until
September 8, 2026. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and
Justice Joymalya Bagchi passed the order after Attorney General for India R
Venkataramani informed the court that the government is preparing a new
comprehensive legislation on Tribunals, in line with the directions issued in
the Madras Bar Association judgment of last year, and intends to introduce the
bill during the upcoming monsoon session of Parliament. The extension serves as
an interim measure to prevent a functional vacuum in Tribunal benches amid the
legal uncertainty created by the striking down of the Tribunal Reforms Act,
2021.
The matter arose from petitions filed by
bodies such as the CAT Bar Association and the Revenue Bar Association, which
expressed serious concerns that impending retirements would render several
Tribunal benches inoperative. The Madras Bar Association ruling had invalidated
key provisions of the 2021 Act, leaving a legislative gap in the functioning
and governance of Tribunals. Earlier, the Supreme Court had directed the
government to present a concrete proposal to address the situation. The
Attorney General submitted that the government is actively working on an
alternative legislative framework and proposed continuing the tenure of
existing appointees under the 2021 Act as a stopgap arrangement to ensure
uninterrupted adjudication. He clarified that around 21 members are due to
retire soon and that a new law is expected to be enacted by next September or
during the monsoon session.
Senior Advocate Sanjay Jain, appearing
for the CAT Bar Association, pointed out that the Madras Bar Association
judgment had mandated a minimum five-year tenure for Tribunal members to ensure
independence and efficiency. The Chief Justice expressed reservations about a
blanket extension without safeguards, questioning the mechanism for evaluating
the integrity and performance of Tribunal members. He observed that extensions
cannot be granted mechanically and emphasized the need for accountability,
asking to whom Tribunal members are answerable and highlighting that their work
must meet required standards. The Chief Justice stressed the importance of a
comprehensive law that clearly defines accountability structures, noting that
Tribunals cannot remain under exclusive government control due to potential
criticism of bias, nor under complete judicial oversight. He further raised
concerns about administrative members not contributing to judgment writing and
suggested the establishment of a mechanism to track reserved matters, including
confidential reporting to the President or Chairperson about which member is
entrusted with drafting a judgment and the expected timeline for delivery.
The bench also addressed the role of
administrative members in adjudicatory functions and the need for transparency
in bench composition and judgment allocation. The Attorney General assured the
court that the government’s proposed legislation aligns with the principles
laid down in the Madras Bar Association case. In its order, the Supreme Court
accepted the government’s proposal and extended the tenure of the affected
Tribunal members until September 8, 2026, or until they reach the maximum age
prescribed under the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021, whichever is earlier. To
monitor progress on the legislative front, the court decided to list the matter
for review every fortnight.
This interim arrangement reflects the
judiciary’s pragmatic approach to bridging the operational gap while pressing
for structural reforms that enhance Tribunal independence, accountability, and
efficiency in line with constitutional principles. The fortnightly listing
underscores the court’s intent to ensure timely enactment of a robust new
framework.