The Supreme Court on July 24 agreed to hear
a contempt petition filed against the Chief Secretary of the Assam Government
and officials of the Goalpara district over alleged illegal demolitions in
Hasila Beel village. The petition, filed by residents of the area, claims that
the demolitions were carried out in violation of the Supreme Court’s guidelines
issued in the case In Re: Directions in the matter of Demolition of Structures
v. Union of India & Ors. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India BR Gavai
and Justice K Vinod Chandran issued notice in the Civil Contempt Petition and
sought a response from the State Government.
According to the petitioners, the residents
of Hasila Beel village have been living in the area for over five decades, with
their forefathers having settled there generations ago. The petition states
that the residents are lawful citizens holding PAN cards, Aadhaar cards, and
voter IDs. Despite this, on June 13, the local circle officer allegedly issued
an undated notice directing all occupants to remove their houses, structures,
shops, buildings, and crops within two days. The notice claimed that the land had
been allotted to the Assam Fisheries Development Corporation back in 2015.
The petitioners contend that the eviction
drive that followed was carried out without proper legal procedure. No
individual notices were served to the affected residents. Instead, authorities
merely made a public announcement using a microphone, instructing residents to
vacate the premises. This, the petitioners argue, is in gross violation of the
principles of natural justice and due process.
Some of the aggrieved persons had
approached the Gauhati High Court through a writ petition. While the High Court
did issue notice in the matter, it declined to grant any interim relief.
Subsequently, the State Government and the Goalpara district administration
went ahead with a mass eviction and demolition operation, which reportedly
impacted around 667 families residing in the Hasila Beel revenue village area.
The petition further alleges that the
demolition drive not only destroyed houses and shops but also led to the razing
of five primary schools in the area. This, the petitioners claim, amounts to a
violation of Article 21A of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to
education.
The contempt plea asserts that the
authorities acted in blatant disregard of the Supreme Court’s judgment dated
November 13, 2024, in W.P.(C) No. 295 of 2022, which laid down detailed
procedures and safeguards to be followed before carrying out any demolition.
The petitioners have, therefore, sought initiation of contempt proceedings
against the respondents for what they describe as deliberate and willful disobedience
of the Supreme Court’s directions.
The plea seeks several reliefs from the
Court, including a declaration that the eviction and demolition were
unconstitutional and in violation of the Court’s prior judgment. It also asks
for a direction to the Chief Secretary of Assam to file an affidavit explaining
the measures taken to disseminate and implement the Supreme Court’s 2024
judgment. The petitioners have further requested the Court to summon the
officials responsible for the eviction and to grant interim relief in the form
of compensation, rehabilitation, and reconstruction of the demolished homes and
schools. The petition was filed with the assistance of Advocate-on-Record Adeel
Ahmed.