The Supreme Court today issued notice in
response to a habeas corpus petition challenging what was described as the
“illegal detention” of a woman by Assam Police, amid ongoing reports of
widescale deportations to Bangladesh. The petition was filed by the woman's
26-year-old son, who appeared through Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal. A bench
comprising Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma passed the order
after briefly hearing arguments from Sibal.
During the hearing, Sibal pointed out that
despite the existence of a bail order and a pending civil appeal before the
Supreme Court, the woman was subjected to deportation on the unilateral
decision of a police officer. “Here, there is a bail order, civil appeal is
pending...and the lady is thrown out. And a Superintendent of Police decides
that. Can your lordships imagine?” he contended, questioning the legality and
propriety of the action. He emphasized that the civil appeal pending since 2017
challenges the Guwahati High Court’s declaration of the woman as a foreigner.
When the bench considered whether the
present habeas petition could be tagged with the pending civil appeal, Sibal
objected, highlighting the urgency of the situation. “But in the meantime, she
is gone. She’s been thrown out. She’s been sent to Bangladesh!” he exclaimed.
Justice Sharma responded, “[But] we can’t call her back...if she’s already not
in the country…” Sibal, however, questioned how such a decision could have been
made by the Superintendent of Police in defiance of court orders, stressing the
lack of clarity around the woman’s whereabouts. “Atleast ask them in the
meantime to tell us where she is, the son does not know...if she’s in
Bangladesh, that’s another matter,” he urged.
Sibal went on to remind the Court of
procedural violations in the case, stating, “Your lordships know she has to be
produced within 24 hours...not produced, sent straightaway, picked up from the
house...directly in violation of this Court’s order in DK Basu...SP goes to the
house, picks her up and throws her...how can that be!?”
After hearing the submissions, the bench
agreed to issue notice to the respondents. In addition to seeking the immediate
release of his mother, the petitioner has also requested the Court to restrain
any “push back” of the detenue, initiate an inquiry against the State of Assam
for her arbitrary arrest and detention, and direct both the Union and Assam
governments to commence departmental proceedings and award damages.
The petitioner's mother, Monowara Bewa @
Manora Bewa, had been out on bail since December 12, 2019, following the
Supreme Court’s order in Supreme
Court Legal Services Committee v. Union of India. That order directed the conditional
release of detenues held in Assam's Foreigners’ detention camps that had
completed over three years in detention. According to the present plea,
Monowara was fully complying with all bail conditions. However, on the evening
of May 24, she was summoned to the local police station under the pretext of
recording a statement. Since then, she has remained in custody and has not been
released. The petitioner alleges that despite informing the police that the
case was still pending before the Supreme Court, the officials refused to release
his mother.