On September 26, the Supreme Court issued
notices to several top officials in a contempt petition concerning
non-compliance with its 2012 directions for ensuring medical care and
computerisation of records for victims of the Bhopal Gas Tragedy. The notices
were issued to the Secretary of the Union Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare, the Director General of the Indian Council of Medical Research, the
Chief Secretary of Madhya Pradesh, and the Principal Secretary of the Bhopal
Gas Tragedy Relief and Rehabilitation Department. A bench comprising Justice
P.S. Narasimha and Justice A.S. Chandurkar sought their response regarding
allegations that the authorities had failed to comply with longstanding orders
aimed at providing effective medical relief to survivors of the disaster.
The contempt proceedings arise out of writ
petition No. 50 of 1998, Bhopal Gas Peedith Mahila Udyog Sangathan v. Union of
India, in which the Supreme Court had issued a set of directions on August 9,
2012. These directions included the computerisation of medical records of the
victims and improving the system of medical care. The Court had also
transferred the matter to the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Jabalpur Bench, for
administrative supervision and proper execution of its orders.
The petitioners alleged that despite the
passage of over twelve years, the authorities have failed to implement the
directions. They pointed out that a contempt petition had already been filed in
2015, yet no effective compliance has taken place. For the last decade, the
High Court has refrained from initiating punitive measures against the
defaulting authorities, despite repeated observations about their lack of
seriousness.
The Monitoring Committee, originally
constituted by the Supreme Court in 2004 and reconstituted by the High Court in
2013, has been chaired by Justice V.K. Agarwal, a retired judge of the High
Court. This Committee has submitted 21 reports detailing the steps necessary
for compliance with the 2012 directions. However, the petitioners argued that
these reports reveal near-total non-compliance. The Committee has highlighted
serious issues such as the departure of doctors and faculty members from the
Bhopal Medical Hospital and Research Centre without their posts being filled.
The High Court has issued several warnings
to the authorities over the years. For instance, in September 2016, it directed
the Union Government to submit a report on the issue of vacant posts and
cautioned that coercive action might be taken if the report was unsatisfactory.
In 2017, the High Court again observed that the Union Government was
deliberately delaying the matter and was not taking proper steps to frame rules
or recruit doctors and support staff. Despite such findings, the authorities
failed to take corrective action.
On the matter of computerisation of medical
records, the National Informatics Centre and the gas hospital reported that the
process had been completed. However, the Monitoring Committee expressed
dissatisfaction, stating that the system was not patient-centric and did not
provide a comprehensive case history of treatment for each victim. The High
Court issued repeated warnings, but they too went unheeded.
Most recently, on January 6, 2025, the High
Court sharply criticised the indifference of the authorities, remarking that
their conduct suggested a lack of seriousness in carrying out the work directed
by the courts. Despite years of directions and monitoring, the authorities have
continued to neglect implementation.
The Supreme Court has now stepped in,
issuing fresh notices to the concerned officials. The matter is scheduled to be
heard again on November 14.