On January 21, 2025, the Supreme Court
strongly criticized the Defence Colony Welfare Association (DCWA), Delhi, for
its unlawful encroachment on the Lodhi-era Shaikh Ali 'Gumti', a 500-year-old
tomb of archaeological significance. The Court directed the DCWA to vacate the
tomb and return its peaceful possession within two weeks. The Court further
instructed that no additional damage should be caused to the Gumti during the
evacuation process, and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) is tasked with
removing any other encroachments, if present. A Court Commissioner has been
appointed to oversee the handover of the monument from the Defence Colony
Welfare Association (DCWA) to the Land & Development Office (L&DO),
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India, the original owner.
In 1962, the land housing the Gumti was transferred to the MCD for its upkeep.
The order was issued in response to a
petition filed by Rajeev Suri, a Defence Colony resident, who sought the
protection of the Gumti under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites
and Remains Act, 1958 (AMASR Act). In August 2024, the Court directed the
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to conduct a preliminary inquiry into why
the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and the Central Government had failed
to protect the monument. The subsequent report revealed that the Defence Colony
Welfare Association (DCWA) not only illegally occupied the Gumti but also made
unauthorized alterations to it.
On November 14 of the previous year,
Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ahsanuddin Amanullah appointed Ms. Swapna Liddle,
former convener of INTACH Delhi and an expert on Delhi's history, to assess the
damage to the Gumti and determine the extent of restoration needed. The Court
had requested her report within six weeks, which was discussed in today's
hearing. The CBI inquiry revealed that the Defence Colony Welfare Association
(DCWA) had been using the Gumti as its office for nearly 60 years. The report
highlighted several unauthorized alterations, including changes to the
structure, installation of electricity and water meters, MTNL cables, wooden
cabinets, a false ceiling, and the construction of a washroom and parking shed.
The Land & Development Office (L&DO) informed the CBI that it had never
allocated the Shaikh Ali Gumti to any individual or organization, and that the
Gumti was under the unauthorized occupation of the Defence Colony Welfare
Association (DCWA). The inquiry confirmed that while the ownership rests with
the L&DO, the DCWA has been illegally occupying the Gumti since 1963.
At the beginning of the hearing, the Court
praised Ms. Swapna Liddle, who appeared in person, for her comprehensive report
on the Gumti. Notably, Ms. Liddle took on the task pro bono and declined the
Rs. 1 lakh token offered by the Court for her efforts. When the Court inquired
about the possibility of fully restoring the monument, Ms. Liddle confirmed it
could be done. Based on this, the Court directed the Archaeological Department
of the NCT Delhi to prepare a restoration report, including an estimated cost,
within three weeks. Although the Court considered assigning the restoration
responsibility to the ASI, it noted that the Gumti had been declared a heritage
site under a state notification.