Member of Parliament and Viduthalai
Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) president Thol Thirumavalavan has moved the Supreme
Court challenging the Election Commission of India’s decision to carry out a
Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Tamil Nadu ahead of the
2026 Assembly elections. He seeks to set aside the Election Commission’s notification
dated 27 October 2025, which initiated the statewide revision exercise. The
petition, filed under Article 32, asserts that the SIR is arbitrary, opaque,
and unconstitutional, and infringes fundamental rights relating to equality,
dignity, and universal adult suffrage.
Thirumavalavan argues that the timing of
the SIR which was announced less than a year before the State elections, creates
a serious possibility of extensive voter deletions, especially from
marginalised communities. The petition states that the design and schedule of
the exercise disproportionately affect Dalits, Adivasis, migrant labourers,
women who move residences after marriage, low-income households, persons with
disabilities, and individuals without stable documentation or digital access.
According to the petitioner, structural barriers such as seasonal migration,
informal or unregistered housing, language constraints, and digital illiteracy
make it extremely difficult for many citizens to comply with the verification
requirements. As a result, large numbers of eligible voters may be excluded
from the rolls without fault on their part.
Relying on the constitutional principle of
indirect discrimination, the petitioner contends that even if the SIR appears
neutral on the surface, it becomes unconstitutional when its practical impact
disproportionately excludes disadvantaged groups. The petition emphasises that
Dalits, Adivasis, women, and working-class communities are significantly more
vulnerable to wrongful deletions, thereby undermining the vision of universal
adult franchise embedded in the Constitution.
To highlight the gravity of the risk, the
petition references earlier instances of mass deletions during intensive
revisions in Tamil Nadu, particularly in 2002 and 2005, where official records
later acknowledged procedural shortcomings. It also cites reports of more than
50 lakh deletions prior to the 2009 Lok Sabha elections and documented
complaints from tribal communities in 2016, suggesting that similar exercises
in the past have had adverse consequences for marginalised voters.
The petitioner further notes that Tamil
Nadu recently completed a Special Summary Revision between October 2024 and
January 2025, culminating in the publication of updated rolls on 6 January
2025, which have since been continuously maintained. He argues that the
Election Commission has not presented any substantive justification for
conducting a fresh, statewide intensive revision so close to the next Assembly
polls.
According to the plea, the current SIR
process departs from the statutory framework under the Registration of Electors
Rules, 1960, which provides for home-based verification by Booth Level
Officers. Instead, the Election Commission has introduced additional form-based
requirements through executive instructions, allegedly without necessary
safeguards such as prior notice or an opportunity to be heard before a voter’s
name is deleted.
The petition asserts that the right to
vote, recognised as a constitutional right under Article 326, is effectively
curtailed by imposing procedural hurdles that disadvantaged groups cannot
reasonably meet. The petitioner characterises this as a form of “soft
disenfranchisement” that weakens democratic legitimacy.
Meanwhile, the ruling DMK government in
Tamil Nadu has also approached the Supreme Court challenging the SIR. In
contrast, the AIADMK has filed an application supporting the Election
Commission’s decision. Actor Vijay’s recently formed party, Tamilaga Vettri
Kazhagam (TVK), has likewise questioned the SIR through a separate petition.
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the DMK’s plea on November 26.