The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)
has informed the Supreme Court that it has decided to release the provisional
answer key after the conduct of the preliminary examination. This decision
marks a significant step towards improving transparency in the examination
process, particularly in the Civil Services Examination, which is one of the
most competitive and prestigious tests in the country. The development came in
the form of an affidavit filed by the Commission last month in a pending
petition concerning the Civil Services Examination.
In its affidavit, the UPSC stated that
while the final answer key would continue to be published after the declaration
of the final results, the Commission has now resolved to issue a provisional
answer key soon after the preliminary examination. This decision, according to
the affidavit, was taken after comprehensive internal deliberations and
consideration of various factors, including suggestions made by the Amicus
Curiae appointed by the Supreme Court in the matter. The Commission emphasized
that its decision stemmed from its constitutional responsibility and the need
to uphold fairness, integrity, and transparency in the conduct of examinations.
Represented by Advocate Vardhman Kaushik,
the UPSC explained in the affidavit that candidates who appear in the
preliminary examination will be allowed to submit objections or representations
against the provisional answer key. However, it specified that such objections
must be supported by at least three authoritative sources to be considered
valid. The Commission further clarified that objections not meeting this
requirement would be rejected at the initial stage itself. Additionally, the
UPSC reserved the right to determine whether the sources cited by candidates
could be regarded as authoritative.
The affidavit detailed the process that
will be followed after receiving representations from candidates. Once
objections are submitted, the provisional answer key along with all objections
and representations will be placed before a panel or team of subject-matter
experts. These experts will carry out a thorough and in-depth review of all
relevant aspects of the questions and the objections raised. Based on their
examination, the experts will finalize the answer key, which will then serve as
the basis for the declaration of the preliminary examination results.
The Commission expressed its intent to
implement this new system at the earliest possible opportunity. It noted that
the decision to publish a provisional answer key and invite objections would
serve as an effective mechanism to address the concerns and grievances that
have been raised in the ongoing litigation. Moreover, the UPSC described this
measure as a proactive step towards enhancing the transparency of its
functioning and strengthening public confidence in its examination processes.
In conclusion, the UPSC’s decision to
release the provisional answer key following the preliminary examination marks
a substantial policy shift in response to judicial scrutiny and stakeholder
feedback. By incorporating candidate participation and expert review into the
evaluation process, the Commission aims to ensure greater accountability and
credibility in its examination system while balancing procedural fairness with
its constitutional mandate.