In the ongoing dispute concerning the
appointment of Vice-Chancellors (VCs) to universities in West Bengal, a
significant development took place as the State government and the Governor
reached consensus on six additional candidates, taking the total number of
agreed appointments to eight. The development was placed before a Bench of
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi during a recent
hearing.
The Court was informed of the consensus by
Senior Advocate Jaideep Gupta, appearing on behalf of the West Bengal
government, and Attorney General R. Venkataramani, representing the Governor.
Both counsels apprised the Bench that discussions between the Chief Minister
and the Governor had resulted in agreement on appointments for eight
universities.
The universities for which consensus was
reached include Sanskrit College & University, Cooch Behar Panchanan Barma
University, Harichand Guruchand University, Raiganj University, Diamond Harbour
Women’s University, Baba Saheb Ambedkar Education University, Uttar Banga
Krishi Vishwavidyalaya University, and West Bengal State University. In light
of this agreement, the Supreme Court directed the Chief Minister, Mamata
Banerjee, to formally forward the names of the approved candidates to the
Governor, who acts as the Chancellor of the universities, so that the official
notifications of appointment could be issued without delay.
However, consensus could not be achieved in
respect of three universities, North Bengal University, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad
University of Technology, and Netaji Subhash Open University. Given the
divergent views held by the State government and the Governor on the
recommended candidates for these institutions, the Court decided that the
matter should be remitted to the Search-cum-Selection Committee for further
consideration. This Committee is headed by former Supreme Court judge Justice
U.U. Lalit.
The Court noted that both parties agreed to
refer the unresolved cases back to the Committee. It accordingly requested the
Committee to examine all materials, records, and submissions that may be
provided by the concerned parties and to make an earnest effort to arrive at a
decision within a period of four weeks. The Court clarified that the Committee
would have the discretion either to recommend a fresh panel of candidates from
among those already considered or to initiate an entirely new selection process
if deemed necessary.
The larger controversy relates to the
appointment of Vice-Chancellors in 36 State-run universities across West
Bengal. Persistent disagreements between the Chief Minister and the Governor
had earlier resulted in a prolonged stalemate, disrupting the administrative
functioning of several institutions. To break this deadlock, the Supreme Court
had intervened and facilitated the constitution of the Search-cum-Selection
Committee under the chairmanship of Justice U.U. Lalit.
Through phased resolutions following the
Court’s intervention, appointments had already been finalized for 25
universities. Despite this progress, appointments in 11 universities remained
unresolved until the present development. With the latest consensus on eight
additional universities, the scope of the dispute has now narrowed further. The
remaining impasse concerning the three universities is now expected to be
resolved through the independent assessment of Justice Lalit’s Committee,
bringing the State closer to completing the long-pending process of VC
appointments across all its universities.